Disposed

Vinod Chandulal Shah v. Securities and Exchange Board of India and Anr.

Bombay HC10 Jan 2019APPR/331/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Bombay restored three criminal revision applications previously dismissed as infructuous because the Sessions Court had not yet framed charges. The court directed their admission listing while retaining the right to dispose of them there and then.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of three criminal revision applications to their original files for admission and final disposal.

Vinod Chandulal Shah Vs Securities and Exchange… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

Sherla V.

¶2

appr.331.2018+_903to905.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.331 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.81 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.186 OF 2018

¶5

Vinod Chandulal Shah … Applicant

¶6

Vs.

¶7

Securities and Exchange Board of India & anr. … Respondents

¶8

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.332 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.83 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.188 OF 2018

¶9

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.333 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2018 IN

¶10

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.190 OF 2018

¶11

Mr.Akshit Jain i/b Rinku Valunju for the Applicant in all APPRs

¶12

Mr.Raghav Shekhar i/b The Law Point for Resp. No.1

¶13

Mr.Vinod Chate, APP, for the Respondent – State

¶14

CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

¶15

DATED: JANUARY 10, 2019

¶16

Page 1 of 3

¶17

appr.331.2018+_903to905.doc

¶18

P.C.:

¶19

Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that by order dated 27.3.2018, this Court had disposed of 8 Criminal Revision Applications on the ground that charges are framed by the Sessions Court in all the Sessions Cases against which the Revision applications are filed and, therefore, the revisions have become infructuous and disposed of accordingly. The learned Counsel submits that in the present three Criminal Revision Applications i.e., 186 of 2018, 188 of 2018 and 190 of 2018, the Sessions Court has not famed charges and, therefore, due to inadvertence, these three applications were also considered as infructuous and disposed of. He submits that qua these three revision applications, the order is to be recalled and they are to be restored to their original file alongwith the respective applications for condonation of delay therein.

¶20

The learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 objects to the restoration on the ground of conduct of the applicants and the delay caused in moving the Court.

¶21

In view of the facts and as the charges are not framed as yet, the present revision applications are restored to their original

¶22

Page 2 of 3

¶23

appr.331.2018+_903to905.doc

¶24

file alongwith the criminal applications for condonation of delay therein.

¶25

The revision applications be listed on board on 5.2.2019 for admission. It is made clear that on 5.2.2019, the revision applications may be disposed of finally at the stage of admission itself.

¶26

The Criminal application Nos.331 of 2018, 332 of 2018 and 333 of 2018 are disposed of accordingly.

¶27

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

¶28

Page 3 of 3

Vinod Chandulal Shah v. Securities and Exchange Board of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Chandulal Shah v. Securities and Exchange Board of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balbhim Namdev Bhange Vs the State of Maharashtra

Manish B. Jain and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Stonemann Royale Ltd. and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shri Mahesh Bhiku Rathod . Vs the State .

Vilas Shridhar Bhabhal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vinod Chandulal Shah Vs Securities and Exchange Board of India and Anr.