Allowed

Abhijit Subash Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC26 Apr 2019APPP/666/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed criminal applications filed by an applicant seeking permission to travel abroad during his family holiday. Applicant had earlier been restrained from leaving India but was previously granted travel liberty; after confirming address proof was furnished and no misuse of liberty occurred, the court permitted the travel.

What did the court decide?

Applicant allowed to travel abroad from 2.5.2019 to 17.5.2019 as per filed itinerary; must report to Investigating Officer upon return.

Abhijit Subash Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

Nalawade

¶2

920-appp-666-19 & ors..doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.666 OF 2019

¶5

¶6

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1777 OF 2016

¶7

WITH

¶8

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.667 OF 2019

¶9

¶10

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1778 OF 2016

¶11

WITH

¶12

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.668 OF 2019

¶13

¶14

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1779 OF 2016

¶15

WITH

¶16

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.669 OF 2019

¶17

¶18

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1780 OF 2016

¶19

WITH

¶20

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.670 OF 2019

¶21

¶22

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1781 OF 2016 WITH

¶23

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.671 OF 2019

¶24

¶25

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1782 OF 2016

¶26

WITH

¶27

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.672 OF 2019

¶28

¶29

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1783 OF 2016

¶30

WITH

¶31

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.673 OF 2019 IN

¶32

Page-1/4

¶33

920-appp-666-19 & ors..doc

¶34

Nalawade

¶35

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2016

¶36

WITH

¶37

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.674 OF 2019

¶38

¶39

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1785 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.675 OF 2019 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1786 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.676 OF 2019 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1787 OF 2016

¶40

Mr.Abhijit Subhash Gaikwad ...Applicant.

¶41

Vs.

¶42

The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent.

¶43

Mr. Siddharth Karpe for Applicant. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP. for State.

¶44

CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 26^th April, 2019

¶45

PC :

¶46

Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned APP for State.,

¶47

All these applications are filed by applicant seeking to travel

¶48

¶49

Page-2/4

¶50

Nalawade 920-appp-666-19 & ors..doc abroad. In view of conditions imposed imposed upon him by this court

¶51

by an order dated 6.2.2017 by which the applicant is restrained from

¶52

going to abroad without obtaining permission from this court and is further directed to furnish his permanent address to Investigating OfÏcer with proof thereof. Counsel for applicant makes a statement that address proof is already supplied to the Investigating OfÏcer and had contended that earlier this curt has allowed applicant to travel abroad

¶53

by order dated 13.4.2018 and 15.10.2018. In support of this application applicant has also placed on record his itinerary according to which he is required to travel along with family for holiday from 2.5.2019 to 17.5.2019 during which period he will be visiting to Hong Kong, Karbi etc. Considering the fact that applicant was earlier allowed by this court

¶54

to travel abroad and since admittedly had not misused liberty granted to applicant, applications are allowed as per order below.

¶55

ORDER

¶56

a) Applications referred herein above are allowed.

¶57

b) Applicant Abhijit Subhash Gaikwad involved in CR Nos. 98/2016,

¶58

92/2016, 93/2016, 123/2016, 91/2016, 101/2016, 99/2016, 100/2016,

¶59

¶60

Page-3/4

¶61

Nalawade 920-appp-666-19 & ors..doc 107/2016, 124/2016 and 97/2016 registered with Chandan Nagar

¶62

Police Station, Pune is allowed to travel abroad as per his itinerary at

¶63

Exh.B Page 12 filed with the application during the period from 2/5/2019 to 17/5/2019.

¶64

c) On returning back on 17.5.2019 applicant shall immediately report his presence with Investigating OfÏcer.

¶65

(P.N. DESHMUKH, J.)

¶66

¶67

Page-4/4

Abhijit Subash Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhijit Subash Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Shrirang Babar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ananta Dhondiba Karanjkar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shrawan Sakharam Wagh and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Surendrapal Surjitsingh Rai Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rahul Raju Gaikwad and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ajit Subhash Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra