Allowed

Ajit Subhash Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC26 Apr 2019APPP/540/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed multiple criminal applications filed by applicants seeking permission to travel abroad for holiday purposes. Conditions previously imposed were adhered to, and the court permitted travel from May 10 to May 21, 2019, provided the applicants reported back to the investigating officer by May 21.

What did the court decide?

Permission to travel abroad from 10/5/2019 to 21/5/2019 was granted with a condition to report to the IO immediately upon return.

Ajit Subhash Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

Nalawade

¶2

920-appp-540-19 & ors..doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 540 OF 2019 IN

¶5

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1777 OF 2016 WITH

¶6

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 541 OF 2019

¶7

¶8

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1778 OF 2016

¶9

WITH

¶10

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 542 OF 2019 IN

¶11

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1779 OF 2016

¶12

WITH

¶13

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.543 OF 2019 IN

¶14

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1780 OF 2016 WITH

¶15

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 544 OF 2019 IN

¶16

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1781 OF 2016 WITH

¶17

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 545 OF 2019 IN

¶18

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1782 OF 2016 WITH

¶19

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 546 OF 2019 IN

¶20

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1783 OF 2016 WITH

Page-1/4

Nalawade

920-appp-540-19 & ors..doc

¶25

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.547 OF 2019 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 548 OF 2019 IN

¶26

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1785 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 549 OF 2019 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1786 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 550 OF 2019 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1787 OF 2016

¶27

Mr. Ajit Subhash Gaikwad ...Applicant.

¶28

Vs.

¶29

The State of Maharashtra

¶30

...Respondent.

¶31

Mr. Siddharth Karpe for Applicant. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP. for State.

¶32

CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 26^th April, 2019

¶33

¶34

Page-2/4

¶35

920-appp-540-19 & ors..doc

¶36

Nalawade

¶37

PC :

¶38

Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned APP for State.,

¶39

All these applications are filed by applicant seeking to travel

¶40

abroad. In view of conditions imposed imposed upon him by this court by an order dated 6.2.2017 by which the applicant is restrained from going to abroad without obtaining permission from this court and is further directed to furnish his permanent address to Investigating OfÏcer with proof thereof. Counsel for applicant makes a statement that address proof is already supplied to the Investigating OfÏcer and had contended that earlier this court has allowed applicant to travel abroad by order dated 13.4.2018 and 15.10.2018. In support of this application applicant has also placed on record his itinerary according to which he is required to travel along with family for holiday from 10.5.2019 to 21.5.2019 during which period he will be visiting to Greece, London etc. Considering the fact that applicant was earlier allowed by this court to travel abroad and since admittedly had not misused liberty granted to applicant, applications are allowed as per order below.

Page-3/4

Nalawade

920-appp-540-19 & ors..doc

¶45

ORDER

¶46

a) Applications referred herein above are allowed.

¶47

b) Applicant Ajit Subhash Gaikwad involved in CR Nos. 98/2016, 92/2016, 93/2016, 123/2016, 91/2016, 101/2016, 99/2016, 100/2016, 107/2016, 124/2016 and 97/2016 registered with Chandan Nagar Police Station, Pune is allowed to travel abroad as per his itinerary at Exh.B Page 12 filed with the application during the period from 10/5/2019 to 21/5/2019.

¶48

c) On returning back on 21.5.2019 applicant shall immediately report his presence with Investigating OfÏcer.

¶49

(P.N. DESHMUKH, J.)

¶50

Page-4/4

Ajit Subhash Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Subhash Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Shrirang Babar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ananta Dhondiba Karanjkar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shrawan Sakharam Wagh and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Surendrapal Surjitsingh Rai Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rahul Raju Gaikwad and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Abhijit Subash Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra