The High Court dismissed the bail application and criminal intervention application as the charge-sheet had been filed, directing the applicants to approach the Sessions Court for bail.
Application disposed of with liberty to prefer bail before Sessions Court; Intervention application also disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23ba97-19.odt
spb/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Cri. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 97 OF 2019
Sohanlal K. Lohar & Anr. … Applicants.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent.
--- WITH CRI. INTERVENTION APPLICATION NO. 224 OF 2019 IN Cri. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 97 OF 2019
Devilal Lohar … Intervenor. In the matter between : Sohanlal K.Lohar & Anr. … Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent.
Mr.S.V.Marwadi, Advocate, i/by V.Y. Mishra for the Applicants. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for the State. Mr. Vinod Kashid, for the Intervenor.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE : MARCH 04, 2019.
PC :
Learned APP submits that the charge-sheet has been filed against the applicants. In view of filling of charge-sheet it would be appropriate for the applicants to prefer an application for bail before the Sessions Court and hence, the
1/2
Borey
23ba97-19.odt
spb/
present application is disposed of with liberty to prefer application for bail before session court.
Criminal intervention application no.224 of 2019 also stands disposed.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
2/2
Borey
Sohanlal K. Lohar & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
Devilal Lohar
PRAKASH D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
