Disposed
The State of Maharashtra v. Sachin Maruti Chaudhari and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPLN/79/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKN 1 79.17-appln.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 79 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 53 OF 2019
State of Maharashtra. V/s. Sachin Maruti Chaudhari and others.
… Applicant.
… Respondents.
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Ms.M.H.Mhatre, APP for the applicant- State.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND A.S.GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 20th February 2019.
P.C. :
Office report shows that notice has been served to the respondents. None appears for the respondents. There is sufficient cause to condone delay of 16 days. Accordingly, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
State of Maharashtra
Sachin Maruti Chaudhari and others
A.S. Oka
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court