Application for bail or early hearing was rejected due to the absence of the advocate and the application filed from jail. Order to be communicated via Jail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nalawade
3-appa-965-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.965 OF 2019 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.588 OF 2015
Nagendrakumar @ Monu Lalkishor Kanojiya ….Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent.
None for the Applicant.
Mr. Arfan Sait, APP. for the State.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI &
MRS. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 12th July, 2019
PC :
(MRS. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.) ( B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page-1/1
Nagendrakumar @ Monu Lalkishor Kanojiya
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
SWAPNA S. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
