Criminal Appellant's request to discharge his advocate and appoint a new one was rejected by the High Court because the named advocate did not file Vakalatnama or appear.
Application to replace advocate is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nalawade
2-appa-866-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 866 OF 2019
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 788 OF 2015
Ram Mahadu Bhokare ` ….Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent.
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 717 OF 2015
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 829 OF 2015
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 896 OF 2015
None for the Applicant.
Mr. Arfan Sait, APP. for the State.
Mr. Abhay Kumar Apte for Appellant in Appeal No.717/2015. Ms. Nasreen Ayubi for Appellant in Appeal No.829/2015. Mr. Aniket Nikam for Appellant in Appeal No.896/2015.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & MRS. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 12th July, 2019
PC :
requests through Jail by letter dated 8.4.2019 to discharge his Advocate
and to appoint Advocate named by him in that letter.
Page-1/2
Nalawade 2-appa-866-19.doc
named has not filed Vakalatnama and he is not present.
( B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page-2/2
Ram Mahadu Bhokare
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Mrs. Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
