Allowed

Kiran Bhanudas Patil and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC8 Mar 2019APPA/317/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal application, the High Court suspended the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on convicted applicants and directed their release on bail pending the appeal of their conviction under Sections 332, 353, 504, and 506 IPC.

What did the court decide?

Suspended substantive sentence; directed release on bail of Rs. 15,000/- each; imposed conditions not to contact victim and not to re-offend.

Kiran Bhanudas Patil and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

(7)APPANo.3172019.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.317 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.338 OF 2019

¶5

Kiran Bhanudas Patil & Ors. ... Applicants V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent

¶6

Ms.Vrishali R. Raje, Advocate for the Applicants.

¶7

Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent/State.

¶8

CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.

¶9

DATED : 8^th MARCH 2019.

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

1 This is an application for suspension of sentence and releasing the applicants/accused on bail during pendency of the appeal filed by them. The applicants/accused are convicted of offence punishable under Sections 332, 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Different sentences are imposed on different counts, the highest amongst them being the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for two years for the offence punishable under Section 332 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned trial Court has directed that substantive sentences shall run concurrently.

¶12

1/2

¶13

Gaikwad RD

¶14

(7)APPANo.3172019.doc

¶15

2 Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant/accused as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶16

3 Short sentence of imprisonment imposed on the applicant/accused has already suspended by the learned trial Court. The applicants/accused were on bail during the trial and they have not misused their liberty. The fine amount is already deposited by them. Hence, the Order :

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(i) The substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on the applicants/accused is suspended and they are directed to be released on bail on their executing P. R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- each and on furnishing surety in the like amount by each of them.

¶19

(ii) As a condition of this Order, the applicants/accused should not contact the victim of crime in question or her relatives in any manner and they should not repeat commission of similar offence in future.

¶20

(iii) The application is disposed of accordingly.

¶21

(A.M.BADAR J.)

¶22

2/2

¶23

Gaikwad RD

Kiran Bhanudas Patil and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kiran Bhanudas Patil and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Bhagirathi Verma Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Kashinath Mallappa Golgi and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ujeet Gangal Mandal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Baliram Pandurang Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mitraprasad @ Govind Shivlal Bhurtel Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Ankush Krushana Waghe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.