Allowed

Baliram Pandurang Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC8 Mar 2019APPA/118/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court Criminal Bench allowed an application by a convicted accused on bail for permission to travel abroad. The court permitted travel to specific countries for specified short periods but denied blanket permission for multiple countries on different occasions, imposing conditions to furnish itinerary and contact details.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to travel to England, France, Italy, Belgium (03/05/2019 to 19/05/2019) and Dubai (October 2019). Blanket permission to travel to multiple countries on different occasions denied.

Baliram Pandurang Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

(10)APPANo.1182019.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.118 OF 2019 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLEAL NO.502 OF 2011

¶6

Baliram Pandurang Shinde ... Applicant V/s.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra

¶8

... Respondent

¶9

Mr.Prajit S. Manjrekar i/b. Mr.Kapil P. Dave, Advocate for the Applicant.

¶10

Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent/State.

¶11

CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.

¶12

DATED : 8^th MARCH 2019.

¶13

P.C. :

¶14

1 This is an application by applicant/accused Baliram Pandurang Shinde for permission to travel abroad in the light of Order dated 30^th July 2018 passed by this Court while granting application of the applicant/accused to apply for passport.

¶15

2 Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant/accused. He submits that the applicant wants to travel to foreign country for the period from 03/05/2019 to 19/05/2019 and thereafter he want to travel to Dubai in the month of October 2019 to meet his sister and thereafter to other foreign countries in the month of May 2020.

¶16

1/2

¶17

Gaikwad RD

¶18

(10)APPANo.1182019.doc

¶19

3 The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that blanket permission cannot be granted to travel several foreign countries on different occasions.

¶20

4 I have considered the submissions so advanced and also perused the Record and Proceedings.

¶21

5 The applicant/accused along with co-accused is convicted of the offences punishable under Section 120-B read with 420, 465 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He is already released on bail by this Court. The appeal filed by him may not be heard in near future, considering the pendency of appeals before this Court. Therefore, the following Order

¶22

ORDER

¶23

(i) The applicant is permitted to travel to England, France, Italy and Belgium for the period from 03/05/2019 to 19/05/2019 as well as to travel to Dubai in the month of October 2019.

¶24

(ii) The applicant to furnish true itinerary to the prosecuting agency and to submit his residential address in the foreign countries so also the contact numbers.

¶25

(iii) The application is accordingly disposed of.

¶26

(A.M.BADAR J.)

¶27

2/2

¶28

Gaikwad RD

Baliram Pandurang Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baliram Pandurang Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Bhagirathi Verma Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Kashinath Mallappa Golgi and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ujeet Gangal Mandal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Kiran Bhanudas Patil and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mitraprasad @ Govind Shivlal Bhurtel Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Ankush Krushana Waghe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.