This application sought intervention in a Criminal Appeal under the Scheduled Cast and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The High Court allowed the application, directing the victim to be impleaded as a respondent.
Applicant/Intervener Pushpa Rajesh Jagtap directed to be impleaded as Respondent no.3 in Criminal Appeal No.422/2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.1-criapp-264-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.264/2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.422/2018
Mrs.Pushpa Rajesh Jagtap )...Intervener In the matter of: Ganpat Suresh Sule … Applicant.
V/s.
1.State of Maharashtra 2.Rajesh Ramesh Jagtap .. Respondents.
Mr.Chaitanya Pendse, for appellant. Mr.V.V.Gangurde, APP for State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 3, 2019
P.C. :
1 This is an application for intervention in Criminal Appeal No.422/2018. The Appeal is u/s 14(A) of the Scheduled Cast and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the same is fled by the accused.
Chitra Sonawane 1/3
10.1-criapp-264-2019.doc
Chitra Sonawane 2/3
10.1-criapp-264-2019.doc
Chitra Sonawane 3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an intervention application is maintainable when the victim is a necessary party under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Cast and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ganpat Suresh Sule
State of Maharashtra
Rajesh Ramesh Jagtap
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
