In an intervention application under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the High Court allowed the intervener to be impleaded as Respondent No. 3 in the main Criminal Appeal.
The applicant was allowed to intervene in Criminal Appeal No. 422/2018 and was impleaded as Respondent No. 3.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
f10-CRIAPP-263-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 263/2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.421/2018
Mrs.Pushpa Rajesh Jagtap … Intervener. In the matter of:
Anil Jagannath Rathod … Applicant.
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents.
Mr.Rushikesh Kale i/b Mr.V.V.Pruwant, Advocate for applicant/appellant.
Mr.VV Gangurde, APP for the State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 3, 2019
P.C. :
1 This is an application for intervention in Criminal Appeal No.422/2018. The Appeal is u/s 14(A) of the Scheduled Cast and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the same is fled by the accused.
Chitra Sonawane 1/3
f10-CRIAPP-263-2018.doc
Applicant/Intervener.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
Chitra Sonawane 2/3
f10-CRIAPP-263-2018.doc
Chitra Sonawane 3/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application for intervention under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act should be allowed for the deceased victim's mother/family.
Whether the applicant should be impleaded as a respondent in the pending Criminal Appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Jagannath Rathod
State of Maharashtra
A. M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
