Allowed an intervenor in a pending criminal appeal to be added as respondent No. 3 and disposed of the criminal application accordingly.
Criminal application disposed of allowing intervenor to be added as respondent No. 3; appellant directed to serve appeal memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4- APPA. 2063-18
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 2063 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1375 OF 2018
Seema Arunkumar Sharma … Appellant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents And Pankaj Ramnaresh Saraf … Applicant / Intervenor in APPA. ***
Mr. Sandeep R. Karnik, for the Applicant Mr. D. H. Shukla, for the Appellant.
Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for Respondent - State.
CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY, & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 3, 2019
PC :
. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned advocate for the Appellant. The intervenor appears to be a party before the trial court. Therefore, in spite of objections on behalf of the appellant, intervention of the applicant in the appeal is allowed. The applicant – intervenor be added as party respondent No. 3 to the appeal. The appellant to serve copy of the appeal memo on the newly added respondent No. 3. The criminal application is accordingly disposed of as allowed.
Sd/Sd/- [SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.] [INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
Pankaj Ramnaresh Saraf
Seema Arunkumar Sharma
The State of Maharashtra
Indrajit Mahanty
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
