The High Court of Bombay allowed the Criminal Appeal as the appellant had expired, declaring the appeal no longer sustainable.
Criminal Appeal No.441 of 1997 disposed of for survival of appellant's death.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(211)apeal-441-97.doc
rkmore
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.441 OF 1997
Andrew Albert Anthony
..Appellant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra
..Respondent.
None for the Appellant.
Mr.H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State.
CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 3rd JANUARY, 2019
P.C.
1] By order dated 19th November, 2018 this Court has directed the learned APP to seek instructions from the local Police Station as to whether the appellant is alive or not.
2] Today, the learned APP has submitted report with copy of the death certificate in respect of the Appellant, who had expired on 23rd July, 2000. The report and death Certificate are taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification,
3] In view of this, Criminal Appeal No.441 of 1997 does not survive and is disposed off as such.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J)
(INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J)
1/1
Andrew Albert Anthony
The State of Maharashtra
Indrajit Mahanty
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
