Amit @ Chimya Raju Rajput v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Single paragraph order where learned APP waived service for respondent. Sufficient cause made out. Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
Single paragraph order where learned APP waived service for respondent. Sufficient cause made out. Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKN
1/1 184.19-appa.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 184 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO. 160 OF 2019
Amit @ Chimya Raju Rajput. … Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. … Respondent.
Mr.Nikhilesh Pote for the applicant. Mr.V.V.Gangurde, APP for the respondent- State.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND A.S.GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 13th February 2019.
P.C. :
Rule. The learned APP waives service for the respondent. Sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
Amit @ Chimya Raju Rajput
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court