This criminal application, admitted by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, concerns bail for a respondent accused. The court granted leave and directed enlargement on bail under Section 390 CrPC 1973.
Trial Court directed to enlarge respondent on appropriate bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKN 1/1 22.19-als.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2019
The State of Maharashtra. … Applicant. V/s. Bangor @ Barbital Dhaka Bale and another. … Respondents.
Mr.V.V.Gangurde, APP for the applicant- State.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND A.S.GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 13th February 2019.
P.C. :
Heard the learned APP for the applicant. Leave is granted. Appeal is admitted. There shall be action under section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. However, the trial Court shall forthwith enlarge the respondent- accused on appropriate bail.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the high court should enlarge the respondent accused on bail pending appeal under Section 390 CrPC 1973.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Bangor @ Barbital Dhaka Bale and another
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
