Application in Criminal Appeal rejected for want of prosecution as applicant was absent and expressed no interest in pursuing the matter. Appeal listed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-APPA-1320-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1320 OF 2019 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.669 OF 2016
SHANKY RAMESHBHAI CHAUHAN )...APPLICANT
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.)...RESPONDENTS
None for the Applicant.
Mr.Vinod Chate, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM:A. M. BADAR, J.
DATE:4th OCTOBER 2019
P.C.:
1The learned advocate appearing for respondent
no.2/victim of the crime in question submits that the applicant is
not interested in prosecuting the instant application, and
therefore, the same be rejected. She submits that, even otherwise,
the paper book is ready and the appeal itself can be taken up for
hearing.
avk 1/2
3-APPA-1320-2019.doc
2None appeared for the applicant. The paper book is
ready and the appeal itself is ready for hearing. Hence, the
application is rejected for want of prosecution with a further
direction to list the appeal for final hearing in the week
commencing from 7th October 2019.
avk 2/2
SHANKY RAMESHBHAI CHAUHAN
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
A. M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court