Petitioner's application made rule absolute accepting joint request of parties and respondent second complainant present in court stating residence with husband.
Application made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
17-APL-1454-18.doc
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1454 OF 2018
Karab Hussain Hakinullah Khan
...Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr.Salimuddin A. Shaikh h/f Shafi Shaikh for the Petitioner.
Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the Respondent/State.
Mr. Priyanshu Mishra, for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI &
N. R. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 17/12/2019.
P.C.:
.Respondent No.2 complainant is present in person. She states
that since last 9 months she is residing with applicant husband and his
parents. Couple also has a male child aged about 3 years. She has also
tendered an affidavit accordingly before this Court.
2.In this situation we accept joint request made and make rule
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
(B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Karab Hussain Hakinullah Khan
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
N. R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court