The High Court dismissed the criminal appeal as abated because the appellant's legal heirs indicated they did not wish to prosecute the appeal further, referencing an earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 apeal-430.19.docx
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430 OF 2019
Meena Baban Paygude … Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Shailesh Kharat for the Appellant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & MRS. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 9th JULY, 2019.
P.C. :
1 In the light of the earlier order dated 11th June 2019 on this appeal, counsel for the appellant upon instructions states that legal heirs do not wish to prosecute the appeal further.
2 In this situation, we dispose of the Appeal No.430 of 2019 as abated.
(MRS. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 of 1
Meena Baban Paygude
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Mrs. Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
