Dimple Bimal Singh and Anr. v. Kenneth Gregory Cardozo and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
48 aost29995-17.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO.29995 OF 2017
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr.A.M.Saraogi for the appellant
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J DATE : APRIL 15, 2019
P.C.:
- . Heard.
- 2 Office note shows that notice issued to Respondent nos.1 and 2 returned unserved with bailiffs remark 'not found and office was found locked'.
3 The learned counsel for the appellant submits that an advocate is appearing on behalf of Respondent in Trial Court. Hence, Applicant is permitted to serve Respondent through their advocate who is appearing for them in Trial Court by private notice along with entire proceeding and file affidavit of service to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondent nos.1 and 2
Coram
K. K. TATED
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
The Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai vs Smt.Parvatibai Kashinath Salunke through Her Constituted Attorney Mr. Sudhakar K. Salunke and Ors.
Mr. Eknath Krishna Prabhu vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.
Ramjiyawan Rambaran Yadav vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.
Mr. Prakash Sodhani vs Mr. Amarpreet Singh Taan