The applicant moved for anticipatory bail. The court was initially not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail, but the applicant's counsel withdrew the application. The matter was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 917.87.19 aba.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 87 OF 2019
Tushar Virmukhlal Shah
.....Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
.....Respondent
Mr. Yunus Memon i/b Mr. Navid Y Memon advocate for the applicant
Smt. J. S. Lohakare APP for the State
Mr. Nilesh Tambe, Uran Police Station, Navi Mumbai.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : JANUARY 11, 2019.
P.C.
After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, when this Court is not inclined to grant the pre-arrest bail, the learned counsel for the applicant makes a motion on instructions to withdraw the application.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Tushar Virmukhlal Shah
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
