Dismissed
Minakshi Dashrath Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCABA/74/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 3 14-ABA-51-19 with 73 and 74-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.51 OF 2019
Vinod Nagnath Sabale & Anr. ….Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra.
WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2019
Dashrath Dnyanoba Gaikwad ….Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent
WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.74 OF 2019
Minakshi Dashrath Gaikwad .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 10th JUNE, 2019
V.B.GOKHALE
2 / 3 14-ABA-51-19 with 73 and 74-19.odt
P.C. :
W. Sambre, J.) had directed the police officers to conduct
3 / 3 14-ABA-51-19 with 73 and 74-19.odt
identification parade. Identification parade was conducted and on instructions, learned A.P.P. makes a statement that four applicants in these applications were identified by the three witnesses. Thus, complicity of the applicants is established.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in lodging FIR and procedural violations in identification parade preclude the grant of anticipatory bail.
Vinod Nagnath Sabale
Dashrath Dnyanoba Gaikwad
Minakshi Dashrath Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court