This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 10-ABA 685-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.685 OF 2019
Chandan Jagmohan Dhowan. ] … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra. ] … Respondent
Mr. Ashish Raghuvanshi for Applicant. Mrs. A. A. Takalkar, APP for State.
CORAM :- SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE :- 07 JUNE, 2019
P. C. :-
Mr. Ashish Raghuvanshi, learned Counsel for the
Applicant, makes a statement that the Applicant is already arrested and the Anticipatory Bail Application has become infructuous. In view of this statement, nothing survives in the Application and the same is disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
URS 1 of 1
Chandan Jagmohan Dhowan
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
