The High Court of Judicature at Bombay considered an anticipatory bail application. The court found sufficient evidence and antecedents of a similar crime, leading to the rejection of the application granted under the Indian Penal Code sections 407, 411, and 34.
Application for anticipatory bail rejected; no bail granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 921) aba58-19.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.58 OF 2019
Amin Abbas Khan ..Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.
Ms.Nazneen Adil for the applicant.
Smt.Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the respondent-State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : JANUARY 10, 2019
P.C.:-
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned
APP for the State.
No.207/2018 for offence punishable under sections 407 and 411
read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Uran police
station, Navi Mumbai.4
report submitted by the investigating officer before the learned
2 921) aba58-19.doc
Sessions Judge, it is noticed that there is sufficient evidence on
record to infer prima facie material against the applicant against
whom there are antecedents of similar crime.
( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant given prima facie evidence and antecedents.
Whether sufficient evidence exists to infer material against the applicant warranting rejection of bail.
Amin Abbas Khan
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
