Allowed

Harish Parshuram Gaikwad v. the Senior Inspector of Police and Anr.

Bombay HC7 Jan 2019BA/17/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction allowed bail to the applicant in Crime No. 384 of 2018 involving assault, unlawful assembly, and riot charges, upon execution of a ₹25,000 bond with a surety.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on executing PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety in the like amount, subject to attending the Investigating Officer and remaining outside police station jurisdiction till framing of

Harish Parshuram Gaikwad Vs the Senior Inspector of Police… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1/3 Yadav 12.ba.17.2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 17 OF 2019

¶4

Harish Parshuram Gaikwad … Applicant Versus The Senior Inspector of Police … Respondents Khadki Police Station, Pune & Anr.

¶5

Mr. Sandeep Bali for Applicant.

¶6

Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for Respondent – State.

¶7

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : JANUARY 7, 2019.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

. In Crime No. 384 of 2018 punishable under Sections 323, 307, 143, 147, 148 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4 read with Section 25 of the Indian Arms Act, Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment and Section 37(1) read with Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, the Applicant came to be arrested on 10^th November 2018.

¶10

The only role attributed to the Applicant is that the Applicant has assaulted the victim Yogesh @ Bunty Santosh Jadhav by fist blows.

¶11

2/3

¶12

Yadav 12.ba.17.2019

¶13

The Common intention is not spelt out from the contents of the First Information Report or Section invoked against the Applicant. There are no criminal antecedents. In that view of the matter, following order is passed.

¶14

ORDER

¶15

(A) The Applicant be released on bail in Crime No. 384 of 2018 punishable under Sections 323, 307, 143, 147, 148 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4 read with Section 25 of the Indian Arms Act, Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment and Section 37(1) read with Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, on executing PR Bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like amount.

¶16

(B) The Applicant shall furnish his contact number to the Investigating Officer within a period of one week from today.

¶17

¶18

(D) The Applicant shall remain outside the jurisdiction of the police station till framing of charge.

¶19

(E) The Applicant shall neither tamper the evidence of prosecution nor influence the prosecution witnesses.

¶20

3/3 Yadav 12.ba.17.2019

¶21

Criminal Bail Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶22

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

Harish Parshuram Gaikwad v. the Senior Inspector of Police and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harish Parshuram Gaikwad v. the Senior Inspector of Police and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitin Ramesh Kshirsagar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ganesh Dnyanoba Gawade Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ramakant Akaram Raut and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vishwesh Sunil Deshmukh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Surekha Nagnath Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dashrath Balu Kesarkar Vs the State of Maharashtra