Allowed

Sahil Vasant Papal v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC13 Jun 2019ABA/153/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants anticipatory bail to an applicant facing charges under the IPC and Indian Arms Act. The court held that since the applicant was only present at the scene and major allegations were against others, no common intention was evidenced, making all out for bail.

What did the court decide?

The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000 with one or two sureties in the like amount.

Sahil Vasant Papal Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 10- ABA No.153-19.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.153 OF 2019

¶4

Sahil Vasant Papal ] … Applicant

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra ] … Respondent

¶7

Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/b Mr. Keral Mehta, Advocate for the Applicant.

¶8

Mr. Prashant Jadhav, APP for the State/Respondent.

¶9

Mr. K.C. Devare, Police Constable attached to Talegaon Dabhade Police Station present.

¶10

CORAM :- SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE :- 13 JUNE, 2019.

¶11

P. C. :-

¶12

The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with C.R.No.72/2018 registered with Talegaon Dabhade Police Station,

¶13

Pune u/sec. 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 307, 341 of I.P.C. and under Sections 4 (25) of the Indian Arms Act.

¶14

The FIR in this case is lodged by one Shubham Yadav. According to him, on 10/02/2018 there was some minor altercation between one Ashish Mechkar and Akshay Garade. The applicant is

¶15

Purti Parab

¶16

1 of 4

¶17

2 10- ABA No.153-19.doc

¶18

the friend of the first informant Shubham Yadav. On 14/02/2018 at about 8.00 p.m., the first informant Shubham and his friend Ashish Mechkar were travelling on Activa two wheeler. When they reached Supreme Company, Urse, the first informant saw Rohan Garade, Aniket Garade, Sagar Manjal and present applicant standing there with two unknown persons. As soon as they saw the first informant and Ashish Mechkar, Rohan Garade came forward and stopped their vehicle. Suddenly Rohan Garade assaulted Ashish with sword. To protect himself Ashish tried to stop the blow with his hand due to which he suffered injuries. Thereafter, the first informant and Ashish started running away from the spot. Rohan Garade followed Ashish. After some time Ashish called their friend Rahul Dhamankar by making a phone call. Thereafter, they came to police station and lodged the FIR.

¶19

Heard Mr. Niranjan Mundargi, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Mr. Prashant Jadhav, Ld. APP for the State/Respondent.

¶20

Ld. APP has produced the investigation papers which includes

¶21

the injury certificate in respect of Ashish Mechkar. There are two

¶22

Purti Parab

¶23

2 of 4

¶24

3 10- ABA No.153-19.doc

¶25

injuries caused to his hand by sharp weapons. Thus, the narration in the FIR is corroborated by the medical certificate.

¶26

Mr. Niranjan Mundargi, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant submitted that the applicant had no role to play.

¶27

Considering the statements in the FIR, it is clear that the first informant and Ashish Mechkar were travelling from that road when the incident occurred. However, the main allegations are made against Rohan Garade who gave blow with sword and who chased Ashish after assaulting him. During the entire episode, there is absolutely no role attributed to the present applicant except the allegations that he was present at the spot. At this stage, it is difficult to observe that the applicant shared common intention with Rohan. In these circumstances, the applicant has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the following order.

¶28

ORDER

¶29

In the event of his arrest in connection with C.R.No.72/2018 registered with Talegaon Dabhade Police Station, Pune the Applicant be released on bail on his executing P.R. Bond in the sum of

¶30

Purti Parab

¶31

3 of 4

¶32

4 10- ABA No.153-19.doc

¶33

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with one or two

¶34

sureties in the like amount.

¶35

Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶36

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

¶37

4 of 4

¶38

Purti Parab

Sahil Vasant Papal v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahil Vasant Papal v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guruanna Ramanna Bamanage and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vinayak S/O Nana Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Alislamoddin S/O Fijjauddin Abadiraje and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shahid Khan Ismail Kahan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nagesh Yuvraj Zende and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Savita Narendra Kothari Vs the State of Maharashtra