This application for anticipatory bail was disposed of as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested during the pendency of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 8 - ABA No.226-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.226 OF 2019
Vinayak s/o Nana Patil ] … Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ] … Respondent
Mr. Dnyaneshwar Kale i/b Talekar and Associates, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Prashant Jadhav, APP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM :- SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE :- 12 JUNE, 2019.
P. C. :-
that applicant is already arrested during pendency of this application.
Hence, this application has become infructuous.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Purti Parab
1 of 1
Vinayak s/o Nana Patil
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
