Disposed

Suman Dinkar Dongre through Her Poa Holder v. the State of Maharashtra Thorugh Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC1 Oct 2018WP/9750/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge Writ Petition accepting administrative assurances to reverse a mutation entry and decide a revision application within stipulated timelines, disposing of the petition while keeping merits open.

What did the court decide?

Reversal of Mutation Entry No.5726 within two weeks; decision of pending revision application within three months.

Suman Dinkar Dongre through Her Poa Holder Vs the State of… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

1/2 wp-9750..18.doc

¶2

pmw

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.9750 OF 2018

¶5

Suman Dinkar Dongre … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents

¶6

Ms. Manjiri S. Parasnis for the Petitioner. Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for the Respondents.

¶7

CORAM : A.S.OKA AND M.S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 1^st OCTOBER 2018.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned AGP for the first to seventh respondents. The learned AGP tenders on record an affidavit of Shri Dunda Pandurang Mali, Circle Officer, Rajur Tahsil, Junnar, Pune. In paragraph 4 of the affidavit, he has stated that he had no knowledge about the order dated 8^th September 2017 passed in Writ Petition No.9787 of 2017 and therefore, he confirmed the Mutation Entry No.5726 on 19^th November 2017.

¶10

2 The learned AGP on telephonic instructions of Shri Dunda P. Mali states that the Circle Officer will reverse Mutation Entry No.5726. We accept the said statement.

¶11

3 The learned AGP on instructions states that the first respondent will decide the pending revision application within a period of three months from today. We accept the said statement.

¶12

2/2 wp-9750..18.doc

¶13

4 Accordingly, we dispose of the petition by passing the following order :-

¶14

ORDER

¶15

(i) We accept the statement made by the learned AGP on telephonic instructions of Shri Dunda Pandurang Mali, Circle Officer that the Mutation Entry No.5726 will be reversed. We, accordingly, direct the Circle Officer to take necessary steps within a period of two weeks from today;

¶16

(ii) We accept the statement that the first respondent will decide the pending revision application within a period of three months from today. We, accordingly direct the first respondent to decide the revision application within a period of three months from today;

¶17

(iii) All contentions on the merits of the revision application are kept open;

¶18

(iv) The Petition is disposed of.

¶19

(M.S. SONAK, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)

Suman Dinkar Dongre through Her Poa Holder v. the State of Maharashtra Thorugh Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suman Dinkar Dongre through Her Poa Holder v. the State of Maharashtra Thorugh Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.C.Panigrahi Vs the Union of India and Anr.

Kuber Housing Investment and Finance Pvt. Vs Tci Finance Limited and 2 Ors.

R.E.Mulay Vs Union of India and Ors.

Airports Authority of India Vs Aercap Ireland Limited and 13 Ors.

Satish Kisan Bhosale and Ors. Vs the Union of India through the Secretary and Ors.

Dasharath Rajaram Jadhav Vs Shivaji D. Patil and the New India Assurance Co.Ltd.