Allowed
R.C.Panigrahi v. the Union of India and Anr.
Bombay HCCAW/2124/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKN 1 2124.18-caw.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2124 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2778 OF 2006
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr.R.D.Saxena for the applicant.
Digitally signed Sanjay by SanjayKashinath Kashinath Nanoskar Nanoskar Date:2018.10.01 18:30:18 +0530
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND M.S.SONAK, JJ. DATE : 28th September 2018.
P.C. :
Not on board. Taken up on board.
Mr. R.D. Saxena
A.S. Oka
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court