Consent Terms dated 3-12-1979, copy of which is at Exhibit “G” to the Memo of Writ Petition No.2320 of 2017, and in the garb of execution and enforcement of these Terms, which are filed in O.S. Writ Petition No.1465 of 1975 { E.P. Dinshaw Trust vs. The State of Maharashtra & Others }, the State is trying to take away the land which the petitioners are occupying and to which they have a right, title and interest, then, we find that the remedy of the petitioners is not to question all this in writ jurisdiction. There is a clear dispute for the respondents to the petitions are not admitting any such act, as is attributed to them by the petitioners. Quite contrary, it is stated that the petitions are not maintainable. Secondly, the petitioners are seeking to reopen a controversy which has been already settled by this Court in the proceedings, the details of which are mentioned in paras 3 to 5 of the affidavit in reply, pages 85 & 86 of Writ Petition No.2320 of 2017. All the more, therefore, in these circumstances, we are disinclined to enter into any factual dispute. The petitioners must institute appropriate proceedings, including bringing a suit in a competent Civil Court. We do not
