The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution after finding the petitioners had failed to comply with a prior order to deposit the imposed fine within the stipulated time.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-deposit of fine and lack of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 (3)WP-4559-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4559 OF 2016
Sushyabai Ambadas Karande & ors .. Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & ors .. Respondents
Mr.Sanjay P. Shinde Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.B.V. Samant, AGP for the State.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT.BHARATI H.DANGRE,JJ.
DATED : 23rd FEBRUARY 2018
P.C :-
1 The Writ Petition is pending in this Court from 28th December 2015. On 15th November 2016, this Court on this petition, passed the following order
“1. “The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners submits that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Petitioners, the fine/penalty which has been imposed by the Collector by an impugned order, will be deposited in this Court within 4 weeks.
Tilak
2/2 (3)WP-4559-16
2 After that order, it was reported that no amount is deposited in this Court. Petitioners and their Advocate appear to be totally disinterested in seeking any relief. Petition is pending in this Court for more than two years. Hence, it is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE,J)
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)
Tilak
Sushyabai Ambadas Karande & ors
State of Maharashtra & ors
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
BHARATI H. DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
