Petitioner challenged extension of suspension violating 90-day review regulation. Court found regulatory compliance in suspension order and subsequent reinstatement. Petition dismissed as no case for interference.
Writ petition dismissed; no case for interference found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(904) WP 959-16.doc
Amk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 959 OF 2016
R. S. Chalke
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Board of Trustees of Port of Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Jaiprakash Sawant for the Petitioner. Mr. Vishal Talsania i/b Motiwalla & Co. for the Respondents.
CORAM : R. M. SAVANT & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 6 th SEPTEMBER, 2018.
P. C.
1/2
(904) WP 959-16.doc
recommendation of the Review Committee and resultantly the suspension of the Petitioner was extended for a further period of 90 days from 24.09.2015 i.e. the date from which the Petitioner was suspended.
[K. K. SONAWANE, J.]
Digitally signed Arjun by ArjunMachhindra Machhindra Kadam Kadam Date: 2018.09.10 18:17:28 +0530
2/2
[R. M. SAVANT, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether suspension extended under regulatory schedule violated 90-day review period mandating revocation or extension.
R. S. Chalke
Board of Trustees of Port of Mumbai
R. M. Savant
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
