Allowed

Smt. Krushna Satyavan Chandaliya v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC5 Sept 2018WP/9316/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging refusal to issue a Valmiki caste certificate was allowed to be withdrawn by the Court pursuant to the petitioner receiving a communication explaining the reasons for non-issue.

What did the court decide?

The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate remedy against the Tahsildar's letter.

Smt. Krushna Satyavan Chandaliya Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

wp-9316-18(903).doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9316 OF 2018

¶3

Smt. Krushna Satyavan Chandaliya ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors ..Respondents

¶4

Ms Sanjukta Dey for the Petitioners Mr. B. V. Samant AGP for the Respondent State

¶5

CORAM :R. M. SAVANT, & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ DATE : 5^th SEPTEMBER, 2018

¶6

P.C.

¶7

1 The Learned AGP tenders the letter dated 31-8-2018 of the Tahsildar, Vasai addressed to the Petitioner. It is mentioned in the said letter that the Petitioner cannot be issued a caste certificate as belonging to “Valmiki caste” for the reasons stated in the said letter. In view of the said communication dated 31-8-2018 of the Tahlsidar, Vasai, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner on instructions of the Petitioner who is personally present in court seeks withdrawal of the above Petition to take appropriate recourse against the said letter. The above Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶8

Digitally signed by Meera MeeraMahesh Mahesh Jadhav Jadhav Date:2018.09.06 15:36:50 +0530

¶9

[K. K. SONAWANE, J] [R.M.SAVANT, J]

¶10

1 of 1

¶11

mmj

Smt. Krushna Satyavan Chandaliya v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Krushna Satyavan Chandaliya v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Menaka Pandit Ashtekar Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.

Miss Sonika Vithoba Kashid Vs the Chief Executive Officer and Anr.

Idea Cellular Ltd. and Anr. Vs M/S. V.K. Architecture and Ors.

Supriya Sattesh Jadhav Vs Bombay Electric Supply and Transport and Anr.

Shamsunder Balwant Parab Vs the Maharashtra Hsg. Area and Development Authority and 2 Ors.

Vivek Madhukar Kanade Vs the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.