The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 943 of 2017 as infructuous on account of subsequent events arising after the filing of the petition, holding no costs.
Petition disposed as infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
947 wp.943.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
947 WRIT PETITION NO. 943 OF 2017
SANJAY TULSHIRAM DHOK VERSUS
THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, LATUR AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Rajkumar B. Dhaware. AGP for Respondent : Mr. S. P. Tiwari. Advocate for Respondent No.7 : Mrs. Priyendra G. Sontakke.
CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J. DATE : 24th January, 2018.
P.C.:
due to the subsequent events, the cause for filing this writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
as infructuous. No costs.
[ V. K. JADHAV, J. ]
ndm
SANJAY TULSHIRAM DHOK
The Additional Collector, Latur and others
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
