Ayubkha Nathekha. v. Babukha Sarfarazkha.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a one-line order where the petitioner was absent. The High Court dismissed the writ petition in default based on a prior order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
904 wp.5661.95.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
904 WRIT PETITION NO. 5661 OF 1995
AYUBKHA NATHEKHA VERSUS
BABUKHA SARFARAZKHA
Advocate for Petitioner : None. Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V. J Dixit..
CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J. DATE : 18th January, 2018.
P.C.:
for Respondent is present.
the writ petition is hereby dismissed in default. No costs. Rule discharged.
ndm
[ V. K. JADHAV, J. ]
AYUBKHA NATHEKHA
BABUKHA SARFARAZKHA
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court