The High Court, a Single Judge Bench, dismissed two Writ Petitions filed by Chandu @ Chandrakant. The petitions sought to summon Yashodabai Venkatrao Tidake as a witness before the School Tribunal to prove claims regarding issued communications. The Court rejected the petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 9129 18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 9129 of 2018.
Chandu @ Chandrakant s/o Shriram Kadam and oth.
… Petitioners.
Versus
Laxman Amrutrao Hamberde and Oth. … Respondents.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 9208 OF 2018.
Chandu @ Chandrakant s/o Shriram Kadam and oth. … Petitioners.
Versus
Ramkishan s/o Dattatraya Sontakke and Oth. … Respondents.
Mr. Y. P. Deshmukh, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. S.P. Tiwari, A.G.P. for respondents No. 2 & 3
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 14th AUGUST, 2018.
ORDER:
1 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners-respondents before the Tribunal.
1/2
WP 9129 18.odt
before this Court. These applications were moved by the petitioners for summoning Yashodabai Venkatrao Tidake, as a witness before the School Tribunal.
( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH ) JUDGE
mkd/-
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should allow the Writ Petition to summon a witness before the School Tribunal.
Whether the Tribunal's refusal to grant an extension for summoning a witness warrants intervention.
Chandu @ Chandrakant s/o Shriram Kadam
Laxman Amrutrao Hamberde
Ramkishan s/o Dattatraya Sontakke
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
