Allowed writ petition challenging impugned order denying petitioner-plaintiff right to cross-examine respondent in pending regular civil suit, subject to payment of costs.
Writ petition allowed to set aside the order refusing cross-examination, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 2,500.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp3326-18
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3326 OF 2018
Vinayak Dadarao Maske PETITIONER
VERSUS
Rajabai Shamrao Dinde and Others RESPONDENTS
Mr. Ramchandra J. Nirmal, Advocate for the petitioner
[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]
DATE : 13th AUGUST, 2018
ORDER :
{2} wp3326-18
instance of petitioner - defendant.
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]
drp/wp3326-18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the refusal of cross-examination should be allowed despite the suit being delayed by the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinayak Dadarao Maske
Rajabai Shamrao Dinde
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
