This is a one-and-a-half-line order dismissing a Writ Petition as infructuous because the underlying suit was dismissed by the trial court. No legal proposition is laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3.wp.9125.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9125 OF 2016
Smt. Latabai Ashok Jambhale & Ors.
... Petitioners
Versus
Chandrakant Dattatray Ingawale & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Prashant P. Kulkarni for Petitioners.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : 15th OCTOBER 2018.
P.C.
. The learned Counsel for Petitioners on instructions submits
that suit in which the order impugned is passed is already dismissed by the learned trial court. That being so, the present Petition has rendered infructuous.
raise the issue before the Appellate Court.
Vijaya Gourishankar Yadav
Digitally signed by Vijaya Gourishankar Yadav Date: 2018.10.16 10:50:56 +0530
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
1/1
Yadav VG
Smt. Latabai Ashok Jambhale & Ors.
Chandrakant Dattatray Ingawale & Anr.
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
