Notice to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it, granting the petitioner liberty to raise issues at the evidence recording stage.
Liberty to raise an issue before the court below at the stage of recording of evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1.wp.4784.15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4784 OF 2015
Malti Anandrao Chavan … Petitioner
Versus
Gunendra Shashupal Sangaj & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. A. B. Borkar for Petitioner.
Mr. Vinayak Kumbhar I/by Ms. Ashwini N. Bandiwadekar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : 15th OCTOBER 2018.
P.C.
a motion is made by the learned Counsel for Applicant for withdrawal of the present Writ Petition.
raise an issue before the court below at the stage of recording of evidence.
Vijaya Gourishankar Yadav
Digitally signed by Vijaya Gourishankar Yadav Date: 2018.10.16 10:50:53 +0530
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
1/1
Yadav VG
Malti Anandrao Chavan
Gunendra Shashupal Sangaj
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
