Dnyaneshwar Ramchandra Patil v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
No.9023/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) WP No.9023/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 9023 OF 2013
Dnyaneshwar Ramchandra Patil. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
Respondents.
Mr. P.L. Shahane, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.
Dated : 26th April, 2018.
ORDER :-
. Seen the order made by this Court on 12.04.2018. On
that day when it was brought to the notice of learned Counsel for the petitioner that the representation of the petitioner has already decided by an order dated 07.03.2014, he had submitted that he wanted to take instructions from his client as to whether his client wants to do anymore in the present proceeding.
(2) WP No.9023/2013
the aforesaid development, nothing survives in the present proceeding. So, the petition is disposed of.
on.
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( T.V. NALAWADE) JUDGE JUDGE
vdd/
Dnyaneshwar Ramchandra Patil
State of Maharashtra
T.V. NALAWADE
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court