use in the present matter in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present matter. In the case like present one, Departmental Enquiry can be continued even after disposal of the criminal case. The approach and standards of proof both are different in the case like present one. In view of these circumstances, this Court holds that at present it is not possible to interfere in the Departmental Enquiry. However, this Court is making it clear that it is the responsibility of the employer to see that the relevant record which needs to be supplied alongwith the chargesheet, is supplied to the petitioner. The grievance is there that alongwith the charge-sheet even list of witness is not supplied. On the basis of the arguments, it can be said that the Department wants to use the record of investigation of police and no preliminary inquiry as such was made by the Department. In such cases there is no necessity of preliminary enquiry and the record collected by police can be used and those statements can be used as previous statements. Copies of those statements need to be supplied to the petitioner, if those witnesses are to be examined before the Enquiry Officer.
