A writ petition filed against the Chief Information Commissioner and others was dismissed for non-prosecution on July 2, 2018, as the petitioner did not appear despite an earlier adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 5_wp_891_2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.891 OF 2015
Abdul Rehman Ibrahim Motivala …Petitioner
Versus
Chief Information Commissioner and Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sagar Patil for Respondent-MCGM.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 2nd JULY, 2018.
P.C.:-
The petition was placed for admission on 11th June, 2018
and following order was passed :-
“None for the Petitioner. By way of indulgence, stand
over to 18/6/2018 to be placed under the caption of
dismissal.”
the Petitioner. The petition is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Megha
1/1
Abdul Rehman Ibrahim Motivala
Chief Information Commissioner and Ors.
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
