The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the current and two previous occasions.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 9_wp_1222_2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1222 OF 2015
Amit Shanbaug & Ors. …Petitioners
Versus
The Charity Commissioner, Maharashtra State and Anr. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. Dushyant Kumar, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 2nd JULY, 2018.
P.C.:-
None appears for the Petitioners today. On the last two
occasions also i.e. on 9th April, 2018 and 6th June, 2018 he was not
present. It seems that he is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
Megha
1/1
Amit Shanbaug & Ors.
The Charity Commissioner, Maharashtra State and Anr.
RANJIT MORE
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
