Disposed
M/S. Sairaj Luminizone Pvt. Ltd. v. Pankaj Doshi and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/8782/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
33-WP-8782-2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
33-WP-8782-2016.doc
Sudhir Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8782 OF 2016
M/s. Sairajluminizone Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner.
Versus
Pankaj Doshi and others … Respondents.
Mr. Yogendra Pendse for the Petitioner. Mr. Arjun Pawar i/b. Mr. S.D. Patil for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE & R.G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 04th JANUARY, 2018
PER COURT :
The learned counsel for the respondent no.1, on instructions, states that the information requested by him has been received, as such, the contentions raised in the instant petition do not survive. Keeping the issue raised in the petition open for consideration as and when occasion arises, the writ petition stands disposed of.
( R.G. KETKAR ) ( R.M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
M/s. Sairajluminizone Pvt. Ltd.
Pankaj Doshi
R.M. Borde
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court