This weakly reasoned order finds no issue to determine after the respondent's counsel stated the requested information was received, disposing the petition while keeping the petitioners' open contentions pending future consideration.
The writ petition is disposed of with the petitioners' contentions kept open for future consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
32-WP8781-2016.doc
Sudhir Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8781 OF 2016
Rishikesh H. Bandiwadekar and others … Petitioners. Versus Pankaj Doshi and others … Respondents.
Mr. Yogendra Pendse for the Petitioners. Mr. Arjun Pawar i/b. Mr. S.D. Patil for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE & R.G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 04th JANUARY, 2018
PER COURT :
The learned counsel for the respondent no.1, on instructions, states that the information requested by him has been received, as such, the contentions raised in the instant petition do not survive. Keeping the issue raised in the petition open for consideration as and when occasion arises, the writ petition stands disposed of.
( R.G. KETKAR ) ( R.M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
Rishikesh H. Bandiwadekar and others
Pankaj Doshi and others
R.M. BORDE
R.G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
