Petitioner sought disposal of writ petition directing respondent to decide a housing application after hutments were demolished, without commenting on merits.
Order directing respondent no. 4 to consider the petitioner's application and take appropriate decision within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
928.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 3369 OF 2017
Pradeep Shamrao Sail and Ors.
...Petitioners
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr.P.M. Jadhav for the Petitioners.
Mr.Shamrao Gore, AGP for the Respondent1 and 4 State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 09, 2018 (Balance board dated 8th March, 2018)
P.C. :
Today when the mater came up for hearing, the petitioner submits that since the hutments are demolished, prayer clause (c ) will not survive now. He prays that this petition may be disposed of by directing respondent no. 4 to decide the petitioner's application Exhibit. D.
1/2
nilegaonkar
928.doc
expeditiously as possible, preferably within four months from the
date of receipt of copy of this order.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
nilegaonkar
Pradeep Shamrao Sail and Ors.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Shantanu Kemkar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
