The court directed the petitioner to submit a proposal in the proper format for acceptance by the committee. Writ petition disposed of.
Petitioner directed to submit proposal in proper format; case disposed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 827.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 827 OF 2018
Priyanka Prakash Shirsewad .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Shri M. A. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for Respondents.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
A. M. DHAVALE, JJ. DATE : 24th January, 2018
PER COURT :
[A. M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe/Jan.18
Priyanka Prakash Shirsewad
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
A. M. Dhavale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
