Final order disposing of three contempt petitions where petitioners submitted that a prior court order was complied with. The court held that contempt was purged and disposed of the petitions.
Contempt petitions disposed of as contempt stands purged due to compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp 92.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 446 OF 2015
Bhimrao Jalbaji Kamble and others .. Petitioners
Versus
Ujwal Uke and others .. Respondents
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 675 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3877 OF 2014
Anil Vishnupant Bhujade and others .. Petitioners
Versus
Ujwal Uke and others .. Respondents
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 666 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5515 OF 2014
Kisan Pandurang Adhe and others .. Petitioners
Versus
Ujwal Uke and others .. Respondents
Shri A. D. Pawar, Advocate for Petitioners in all matters. Shri A. V. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for Respondent/State in all matters.
2 cp 92.16
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND ARUN M. DHAVALE, JJ. DATE : 23RD JANUARY, 2018.
FINAL ORDER :
[ARUN M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/Jan. 17
Bhimrao Jalbaji Kamble and others
Anil Vishnupant Bhujade and others
Kisan Pandurang Adhe and others
Ujwal Uke and others
S. V. Gangapurwala
Arun M. Dhavale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
