The Single Bench held that the case was not a fit case to exercise writ jurisdiction to quash the FIR at this stage and dismissed the petition, vacating the interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-wp.800.2018.doc
1/2
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.800 OF 2018
Gopi Manjoji Rao and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Rakhee Rishi Punnilath and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Dharmesh Singh i/b Law Computer Consultants, for the Petitioners.
Mr.Indrajeet Joshi i/b Mr.Shail Chaudhary, for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mrs.A.S.Pai, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : R. M. SAVANT & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : 7th JUNE, 2018
P.C. :
being C.R.No.0466 of 2017 registered with Kharghar Police Station, Navi
Mumbai on 21st December, 2017. A reading of the FIR discloses that prima
facie the ingredients of the offences alleged against the Petitioners are made
out.
18-wp.800.2018.doc
2/2
Jurisdiction at this stage. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. The
interim order stands vacated.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
(R. M. SAVANT, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court's writ jurisdiction is exercisable to quash the FIR at this stage.
Gopi Manjoji Rao and Ors.
Rakhee Rishi Punnilath and Ors.
R. M. Savant
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
