Petitioner sought leave to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one. Court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without adjudicating merits.
Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905 wp 7867.13.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7867 OF 2013
Parshuram Ganpati Chavan ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Dilip B. Shinde, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for the State. Mr. N. R. Bubna, advocate for the respondent No.2.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : 14th FEBRUARY, 2018.
P. C. :
Mr. Shinde, learned counsel for the petitioner, having taken instructions from his clients, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one. Leave with liberty as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
[SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Parshuram Ganpati Chavan
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
