The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking a declaration that acquisition of land lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. The Court held that compensation was accepted in 1989 and possession handed over in 1993, finding no merit in the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 8_wp_11813_2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.11813 OF 2013
Pandurang Kisan Nhavi (Pande) & …Petitioners Ors. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. M.J. Jamdar for the Petitioners. Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. R.S. Pachundkar for the Respondent No.9.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 13th FEBRUARY, 2018.
P.C.:-
Heard Mr. Jamdar, the learned counsel for the Petitioner,
Mr. Pachundkar, the learned counsel for the Respondent No.9 and Mr.
Sawant, the learned AGP for the Respondent -State.
Megha
1/3
Megha 8_wp_11813_2016.doc
land is received by the Petitioners' father. He submits that the Petitioners lost possession thereof in the year 2015.
Megha
2/3
Megha 8_wp_11813_2016.doc
Petition is accordingly dismissed.
to apply to the appropriate authority for the same.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
Megha
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the acquisition of the subject land has lapsed by virtue of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pandurang Kisan Nhavi (Pande) & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Ranjit More
Anuja PrabhuDEssai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
